Serchen
Crowdin logo

Crowdin

★★★★ 3.7 · 3 Reviews

What is Crowdin?

Localize your product in a seamless way Get quality translations for your app, website, game, supporting documentation and on. Invite your own translation team or work with professional translation agencies within Crowdin. Features that ensure quality translations and speed up the process • Glossary – create a list of terms to get consistent translations • Translation Memory (TM) – no need to translate identical strings • Screenshots – tag source strings to get context relevant translations • Integrations – set up integration with GitHub, Google Play, API, CLI, Android Studio and on • QA checks – make sure that all the translations have the same meaning and functions as the source strings • In-Context – proofreading within the actual web application • Machine Translations (MT) – pre-translate via translation engine • Reports – get insights, plan and manage the project Crowdin supports more than 30 file formats for mobile, software, documents, subtitles, graphics and assets: .xml, .strings, .json, .html, .xliff, .csv, .php, .resx, .yaml, .xml, .properties, .strings and on.

Alternatives to Crowdin

See all in Content Management Software

Crowdin Reviews (3)

3.7
★★★★
3 reviews
  • ★★★★★2
  • ★★★★0
  • ★★★★★0
  • ★★★★★0
  • ★★★★1

Review Summary

Generated using AI from real user reviews

Crowdin divides users sharply: some find it indispensable for collaborative translation management, while others see it as cumbersome and ad-supported.

Supporters praise its cloud-based workflow, real-time project tracking, flexible resource uploads (manual or API), glossary creation, and built-in communication tools for coordinating translators and editors. The platform handles the core job well for teams that value centralized coordination.

Critics point to a slow, cumbersome UI that hampers efficiency, a poorly designed voting system that delays translations, and concerns about tracking and advertising. One reviewer also flags the closed-source nature as a limitation. Those reviews suggest the platform works best for managed teams rather than rapid, high-volume workflows, and may frustrate users concerned about data practices.

Related Categories